https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00220345211015948
/>
>The salivary SARS-CoV-2 load in our study is consistent
>with previous reports of 102 to 106 copies/mL (Chau et al. 2020);
>however, none was detected in any aerosol.
>In summary, we find sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis
>that saliva is a potential source of disease transmission during AGDPs.
>Instead, we identify, for the first time, that the irrigant used
>in dental equipment is the primary and major source of microorganisms during AGDPs. last-modified: 2021-08-26 01:09:23